AMD Radeon Vega 9 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 9 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Vega 9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 9

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 50% higher pipelines: 576 vs 384
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
11.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 170 Watt

Launch date	26 Oct 2017 vs 25 January 2011
Pipelines	576 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 170 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 434 vs 402
Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3059 vs 1588
Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10723 vs 9577
Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4184 vs 2591
Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4184 vs 2591
Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1856
Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1856
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2482
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2482

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	434 vs 402
PassMark - G3D Mark	3059 vs 1588
Geekbench - OpenCL	10723 vs 9577
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4184 vs 2591
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4184 vs 2591
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 vs 1856
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 vs 1856
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3333 vs 2482
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3333 vs 2482

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 9
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

402

434

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1588

3059

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9577

10723

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2591

4184

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2591

4184

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1856

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1856

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2482

3333

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2482

3333

Name	AMD Radeon Vega 9	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark	402	434
PassMark - G3D Mark	1588	3059
Geekbench - OpenCL	9577	10723
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2591	4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2591	4184
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1856	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1856	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2482	3333
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2482	3333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		31.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		539.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		35.841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		64.308
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		389

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Vega 9	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Vega	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Vega Raven Ridge	GF114
Launch date	26 Oct 2017	25 January 2011
Place in performance rating	817	815
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$249
Price now		$138
Value for money (0-100)		27.88
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	576	384
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	170 Watt
Transistor count	4500 million	1,950 million
Core clock speed		823 MHz
Floating-point performance		1,263.4 gflops
Texture fill rate		52.7 GTexel / s
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL		4.6
Memory
Shared memory	Yes
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Memory bandwidth		128.3 GB / s
Memory bus width		256 Bit
Memory clock speed		4008 MHz
Memory type		GDDR5
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors		2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface		PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		229 mm
Supplementary power connectors		2x 6-pin