ATI FirePro V3800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM

Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro V3800 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V3800

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
• 2x better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 vs 82
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2958 vs 2505
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2958 vs 2505

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM

• Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 395 vs 321

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI FirePro V3800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	321 395
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	179 82
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 2505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 2505

Compare specifications (specs)