NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M vs ATI FirePro V3800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M and ATI FirePro V3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 43 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 538 vs 321
  • Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 5.055 vs 3.432
  • Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.004 vs 153.019
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.635 vs 0.29
  • Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.393 vs 10.314
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2766 vs 1572
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2958
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2766 vs 1572
  • Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2958
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 22 March 2012 vs 26 April 2010
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt vs 43 Watt
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 538 vs 321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.055 vs 3.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 215.004 vs 153.019
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.635 vs 0.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.393 vs 10.314
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2766 vs 1572
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 2958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2766 vs 1572
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 2958

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V3800

  • 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
  • 2.1x better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 vs 150
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 48.552 vs 19.903
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 400 vs 96
Floating-point performance 520.0 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 179 vs 150
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 48.552 vs 19.903

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V3800

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
538
321
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
150
179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.055
3.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
215.004
153.019
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.635
0.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.393
10.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.903
48.552
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2766
1572
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
2958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2766
1572
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
2958
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M ATI FirePro V3800
PassMark - G3D Mark 538 321
PassMark - G2D Mark 150 179
Geekbench - OpenCL 2399
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.055 3.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 215.004 153.019
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.635 0.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.393 10.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 19.903 48.552
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2766 1572
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 2958
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2766 1572
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 2958
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M ATI FirePro V3800

Essentials

Architecture Fermi TeraScale 2
Code name GF108 Redwood
Launch date 22 March 2012 26 April 2010
Place in performance rating 1403 1405
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $129

Technical info

CUDA cores 96
Floating-point performance 253.4 gflops 520.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 96 400
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt 43 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 627 million
Core clock speed 650 MHz
Texture fill rate 13 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
DirectX 11.2 12 API
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3\GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus