NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs ATI FirePro V3800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1000M and ATI FirePro V3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

ATI FirePro V3800

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 31% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 650 MHz
Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 13.6 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 780 vs 321
Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 250 vs 179
Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.636 vs 3.432
Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.454 vs 0.29
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1695 vs 1572
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1695 vs 1572

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 June 2012 vs 26 April 2010
Core clock speed	850 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate	13.6 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	780 vs 321
PassMark - G2D Mark	250 vs 179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.636 vs 3.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.454 vs 0.29
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1695 vs 1572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1695 vs 1572

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V3800

2.1x more pipelines: 400 vs 192
Around 59% better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 45 Watt
Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 153.019 vs 115.549
Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.314 vs 7.024
4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 48.552 vs 10.485
Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2958 vs 2297
Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2958 vs 2297

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	400 vs 192
Floating-point performance	520.0 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	43 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	153.019 vs 115.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	10.314 vs 7.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	48.552 vs 10.485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2958 vs 2297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2958 vs 2297

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V3800

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

780

321

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

250

179

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.636

3.432

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

115.549

153.019

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.454

0.29

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.024

10.314

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.485

48.552

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1695

1572

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2297

2958

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1695

1572

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2297

2958

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K1000M	ATI FirePro V3800
PassMark - G3D Mark	780	321
PassMark - G2D Mark	250	179
Geekbench - OpenCL	1715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.636	3.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	115.549	153.019
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.454	0.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	7.024	10.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	10.485	48.552
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1695	1572
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2297	2958
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1695	1572
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2297	2958

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K1000M	ATI FirePro V3800
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Code name	GK107	Redwood
Launch date	1 June 2012	26 April 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$119.90	$129
Place in performance rating	1401	1404
Price now	$149.90
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	6.18
Technical info
Core clock speed	850 MHz	650 MHz
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	520.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	192	400
Texture fill rate	13.6 GTexel / s	13 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	43 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	627 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Length		168 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory	0