NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs ATI FirePro V3800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1000M and ATI FirePro V3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 31% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 13.6 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 778 vs 321
  • Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 249 vs 179
  • Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.636 vs 3.432
  • Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.454 vs 0.29
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1695 vs 1572
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1695 vs 1572
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 June 2012 vs 26 April 2010
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate 13.6 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 778 vs 321
PassMark - G2D Mark 249 vs 179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.636 vs 3.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.454 vs 0.29
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1695 vs 1572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1695 vs 1572

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V3800

  • 2.1x more pipelines: 400 vs 192
  • Around 59% better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
  • Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 153.019 vs 115.549
  • Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.314 vs 7.024
  • 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 48.552 vs 10.485
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2958 vs 2297
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2958 vs 2297
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 400 vs 192
Floating-point performance 520.0 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 43 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 153.019 vs 115.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.314 vs 7.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 48.552 vs 10.485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2958 vs 2297
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2958 vs 2297

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V3800

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
778
321
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
249
179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.636
3.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
115.549
153.019
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.454
0.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7.024
10.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.485
48.552
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1695
1572
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2297
2958
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1695
1572
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2297
2958
Name NVIDIA Quadro K1000M ATI FirePro V3800
PassMark - G3D Mark 778 321
PassMark - G2D Mark 249 179
Geekbench - OpenCL 1739
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.636 3.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 115.549 153.019
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.454 0.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 7.024 10.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 10.485 48.552
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1695 1572
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2297 2958
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1695 1572
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2297 2958

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M ATI FirePro V3800

Essentials

Architecture Kepler TeraScale 2
Code name GK107 Redwood
Launch date 1 June 2012 26 April 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $119.90 $129
Place in performance rating 1402 1405
Price now $149.90
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 6.18

Technical info

Core clock speed 850 MHz 650 MHz
Floating-point performance 326.4 gflops 520.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 192 400
Texture fill rate 13.6 GTexel / s 13 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 43 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 627 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0