ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI Radeon E4690

Comparative analysis of ATI FirePro V8800 and ATI Radeon E4690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V8800

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 38% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 3.4x more texture fill rate: 66.0 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
• 5x more pipelines: 1600 vs 320
• 6.9x better floating-point performance: 2,640.0 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
• 3.3x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1400 MHz
• 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2281 vs 405
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 vs 347
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3302
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3302

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E4690

• 6.9x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 208 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI FirePro V8800
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E4690

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2281 405
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	445 347
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3302
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3302

Compare specifications (specs)