NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs ATI FirePro V8800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000M and ATI FirePro V8800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 825 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 208 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4600 MHz
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3457 vs 2281
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.281 vs 18.27
- 9.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.5 vs 0.357
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.048 vs 49.357
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3575
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3575
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 December 2015 vs 7 April 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 208 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3457 vs 2281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 vs 18.27 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 vs 0.357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.048 vs 49.357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3575 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V8800
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 66.0 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 1600 vs 640
- Around 88% better floating-point performance: 2,640.0 gflops vs 1,405 gflops
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 vs 339
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36751 vs 8148
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1180.667 vs 782.113
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 228.843 vs 172.896
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 66.0 GTexel / s vs 43.92 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1600 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops vs 1,405 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 vs 339 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36751 vs 8148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1180.667 vs 782.113 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 228.843 vs 172.896 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V8800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | ATI FirePro V8800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3457 | 2281 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 | 445 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8148 | 36751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 | 18.27 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 782.113 | 1180.667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 | 0.357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.048 | 49.357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 172.896 | 228.843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | ATI FirePro V8800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM107 | Cypress |
Launch date | 3 December 2015 | 7 April 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 719 | 722 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1098 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 825 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 2,640.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1600 |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 GTexel / s | 66.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 208 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 147.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |