ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 4 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 130 nm
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 168 vs 41
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 267 vs 170
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 May 2007 vs 23 October 2003 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 130 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 168 vs 41 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 267 vs 170 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
- Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 850 MHz vs 800 MHz
Memory clock speed | 850 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 168 | 41 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 267 | 170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1690 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Rankine |
Code name | M76 | NV35 |
Launch date | 14 May 2007 | 23 October 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1039 | 1041 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 120 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 120 | |
Texture fill rate | 4 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 390 million | 135 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 59 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-II | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 218 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 27.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 850 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2, GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerPlay 7.0 |