ATI Radeon HD 4730 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 4730 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4730 OEM
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 320 vs 240
- Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 204 Watt
Pipelines | 320 vs 240 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 204 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 669 MHz
- 4.8x more texture fill rate: 51.8 billion / sec vs 10.7 GTexel / s
- Around 65% better floating-point performance: 708.5 gflops vs 428.2 gflops
- Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 792 MHz
Core clock speed | 1476 MHz vs 669 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 51.8 billion / sec vs 10.7 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 708.5 gflops vs 428.2 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 792 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 4730 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
Name | ATI Radeon HD 4730 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1513 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 72 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22124 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 4730 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | RV670 | GT200B |
Launch date | 26 December 2008 | 23 December 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1200 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $359 | |
Price now | $179.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 669 MHz | 1476 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 428.2 gflops | 708.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 240 |
Texture fill rate | 10.7 GTexel / s | 51.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 204 Watt |
Transistor count | 666 million | 1,400 million |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.34 GB / s | 159.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 792 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
SLI |