ATI Radeon HD 5450 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5450 and ATI Radeon HD 5750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 86 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2572 vs 1039
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 February 2010 vs 13 October 2009 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 86 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2572 vs 1039 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 700 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 4.8x more texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 9x more pipelines: 720 vs 80
- 9.7x better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 104 gflops
- 5.8x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 8.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1168 vs 136
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 140
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.679 vs 0.16
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.346 vs 10.124
- 6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2124 vs 344
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1757 vs 666
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 1457
- 6.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2124 vs 344
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1757 vs 666
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 1457
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 700 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 720 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 104 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1168 vs 136 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 vs 140 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.679 vs 0.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.346 vs 10.124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2124 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1757 vs 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 1457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2124 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1757 vs 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 1457 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5450
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon HD 5450 | ATI Radeon HD 5750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 136 | 1168 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 | 338 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2572 | 1039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.16 | 0.679 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.124 | 53.346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 344 | 2124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 666 | 1757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1457 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 344 | 2124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 666 | 1757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1457 | 3347 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.384 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 460.31 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.118 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 5450 | ATI Radeon HD 5750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Cedar | Juniper |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series |
Launch date | 4 February 2010 | 13 October 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1606 | 1209 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | 700 MHz |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 720 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 86 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | 178 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |