ATI Radeon HD 5450 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5450 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 459 MHz
- Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 3.6 billion / sec
- 5x more pipelines: 80 vs 16
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 104 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 140 vs 24
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2572 vs 1791
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 666 vs 224
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1457 vs 445
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 666 vs 224
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1457 vs 445
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 February 2010 vs 17 April 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 459 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s vs 3.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 80 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 104 gflops vs 29.376 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 40 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 vs 24 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2572 vs 1791 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 666 vs 224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1457 vs 445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 666 vs 224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1457 vs 445 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 156 vs 136
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 156 vs 136 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5450 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 136 | 156 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 | 24 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2572 | 1791 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.16 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 666 | 224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1457 | 445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 666 | 224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1457 | 445 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5450 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Cedar | G86 |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 4 February 2010 | 17 April 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 1606 | 1695 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $29.99 | |
| Price now | $39.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.68 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 459 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | 29.376 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 80 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 3.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | 170 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR2 | DDR2 |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5450 with others
ATIRadeon HD 5450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9500M GS
ATIRadeon HD 5450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9400M G
ATIRadeon HD 5450 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6310
ATIRadeon HD 5450 vs
IntelHD Graphics 3000
ATIRadeon HD 5450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 520
ATIRadeon HD 5450 vs
AMDRadeon R3 Graphics
