ATI Radeon HD 5450 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5450 and NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.5x more pipelines: 80 vs 32
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 104 gflops vs 89.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 / 512 MB
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 140 vs 32
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 February 2010 vs 29 July 2008 |
| Pipelines | 80 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 104 gflops vs 89.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 / 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 vs 32 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 8.8 billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 172 vs 136
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1505 vs 1457
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1505 vs 1457
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 8.8 billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 172 vs 136 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1505 vs 1457 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1505 vs 1457 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5450 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 136 | 172 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 140 | 32 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2572 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.16 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 666 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1457 | 1505 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 344 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 666 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1457 | 1505 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.838 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5450 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Cedar | G96C |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 4 February 2010 | 29 July 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1606 | 1666 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $85.99 | |
| Price now | $85.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 4.13 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 104 gflops | 89.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 80 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 8.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 314 million |
| CUDA cores | 32 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | 6.875" (17.5 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 / 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2) |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
| Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5450 with others
ATIRadeon HD 5450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9500M GS
ATIRadeon HD 5450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9400M G
ATIRadeon HD 5450 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6310
ATIRadeon HD 5450 vs
IntelHD Graphics 3000
ATIRadeon HD 5450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 520
ATIRadeon HD 5450 vs
AMDRadeon R3 Graphics
