ATI Radeon HD 5470 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5470 and NVIDIA Tesla M2090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5470
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 13.2x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 13 February 2012 vs 25 July 2011 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2090
- 7x more texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 512 vs 80
- 12.8x better floating-point performance: 1,331.2 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 3700 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5470
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Name | ATI Radeon HD 5470 | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 268 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 298 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 960 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 960 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1771 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1771 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 5470 | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Cedar | GF110 |
Launch date | 13 February 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1089 | 1090 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 1,331.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 36.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | 248 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 177.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 3700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |