ATI Radeon HD 5470 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5470 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5470
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 70 Watt
| Launch date | 13 February 2012 vs 14 May 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 70 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 17.28 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 144 vs 80
- 4x better floating-point performance: 414.7 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 512 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1101 vs 268
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 325 vs 298
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3323 vs 960
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3323 vs 960
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1771
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1771
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 17.28 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 144 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 414.7 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1101 vs 268 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 vs 298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3323 vs 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3323 vs 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1771 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1771 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5470
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 545
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5470 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 268 | 1101 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 298 | 325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 960 | 3323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 960 | 3323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1771 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1771 | 3356 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3677 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.32 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 306.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.883 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.564 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 35.369 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1893 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1893 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5470 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Cedar | GF116 |
| Launch date | 13 February 2012 | 14 May 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1089 | 1092 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $55.59 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 26.90 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 414.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 80 | 144 |
| Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s | 17.28 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 1,170 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | 145 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
