ATI Radeon HD 5570 vs AMD Radeon HD 6630M

Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5570 and AMD Radeon HD 6630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5570

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 13 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1378 vs 984
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.393 vs 2.847
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 235.572 vs 142.549
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.345 vs 9.527
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.016 vs 42.818
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1160 vs 424
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1883 vs 1055
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 2368
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1160 vs 424
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1883 vs 1055
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 2368

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6630M

• Around 20% higher pipelines: 480 vs 400
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 26 Watt vs 39 Watt
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 685 vs 480
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 390 vs 193

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6630M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	480 685
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	193 390
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1378 984
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.393 2.847
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	235.572 142.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.345 9.527
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.016 42.818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1160 424
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1883 1055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 2368
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1160 424
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1883 1055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 2368

Compare specifications (specs)