NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M vs ATI Radeon HD 5570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M and ATI Radeon HD 5570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 650 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 39 Watt
• Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 571 vs 480
• Around 81% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2492 vs 1378
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.55 vs 0.454
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.858 vs 11.345
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1263 vs 1160
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2479 vs 1883
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1263 vs 1160
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2479 vs 1883

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5570

• Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 13 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
• Around 75% better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 146
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.393 vs 2.692
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 235.572 vs 161.29
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.016 vs 17.753
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3327
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3327

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	571 480
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	146 193
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2492 1378
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.692 4.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	161.29 235.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.55 0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.858 11.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.753 49.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1263 1160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2479 1883
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3327 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1263 1160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2479 1883
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3327 3360

Compare specifications (specs)