NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs ATI Radeon HD 5570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K600 and ATI Radeon HD 5570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 876 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 14.02 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 728 vs 478
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 278 vs 198
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1830 vs 1370
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.367 vs 4.393
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1227 vs 1160
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1227 vs 1160

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5570

• 2.1x more pipelines: 400 vs 192
• Around 55% better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 336.4 gflops
• Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 39 Watt vs 41 Watt
• Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 235.572 vs 118.389
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.454 vs 0.396
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.345 vs 7.921
• 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.016 vs 9.393
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1883 vs 1745
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 2261
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1883 vs 1745
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 2261

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K600
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	728 478
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	278 198
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1830 1370
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.367 4.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	118.389 235.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.396 0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.921 11.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.393 49.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1227 1160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1745 1883
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2261 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1227 1160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1745 1883
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2261 3360

Compare specifications (specs)