NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5570

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM and ATI Radeon HD 5570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 96% higher texture fill rate: 25.5 GTexel / s vs 13 GTexel / s
• Around 18% better floating-point performance: 612.1 gflops vs 520.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.932 vs 4.393
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 254.345 vs 235.572
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.14 vs 0.454
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.613 vs 11.345
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1502 vs 1160
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2167 vs 1883
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1502 vs 1160
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2167 vs 1883

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5570

• Around 4% higher pipelines: 400 vs 384
• Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 39 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.016 vs 15.32
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3334
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3334

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5570

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.932 4.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	254.345 235.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.14 0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.613 11.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.32 49.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1502 1160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2167 1883
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1502 1160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2167 1883
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3360

Compare specifications (specs)