ATI Radeon HD 5570 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5570 and NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 13 GTexel / s vs 8.8 billion / sec
- 12.5x more pipelines: 400 vs 32
- 5.8x better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 89.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 39 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 / 512 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 478 vs 172
- 6.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 198 vs 32
- 7.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.393 vs 0.612
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 235.572 vs 56.838
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1505
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1505
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 October 2011 vs 29 July 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 13 GTexel / s vs 8.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 400 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops vs 89.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 / 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 478 vs 172 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 vs 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.393 vs 0.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.572 vs 56.838 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 1505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 1505 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 650 MHz
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon HD 5570 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 478 | 172 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 | 32 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1370 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.393 | 0.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.572 | 56.838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.454 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.345 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.016 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1883 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 1505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1160 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1883 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 1505 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon HD 5570 | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Turks | G96C |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Launch date | 11 October 2011 | 29 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1369 | 1666 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $85.99 | |
Price now | $85.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 520.0 gflops | 89.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 13 GTexel / s | 8.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 165 mm | 6.875" (17.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 / 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2) |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |