ATI Radeon HD 5750 vs ATI Radeon HD 4670
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon HD 5750 and ATI Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 720 vs 320
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1168 vs 382
- 9.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 35
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 3285
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 3285
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 October 2009 vs 10 September 2008 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 720 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1168 vs 382 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 vs 35 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4670
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 59 Watt vs 86 Watt
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 59 Watt vs 86 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon HD 5750
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | ATI Radeon HD 5750 | ATI Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1168 | 382 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | 35 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.384 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 460.31 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.679 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.118 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1757 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1757 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 3285 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| ATI Radeon HD 5750 | ATI Radeon HD 4670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale |
| Code name | Juniper | RV730 |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Launch date | 13 October 2009 | 10 September 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1209 | 1459 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $67 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 700 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008.0 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 720 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt | 59 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 178 mm | 193 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare ATI Radeon HD 5750 with others
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9600 PRO Turbo
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870 X2
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9300M G
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6490M
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M
ATIRadeon HD 5750 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000
