NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M and ATI Radeon HD 5750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 86 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2229 vs 1039
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2333 vs 1757
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2333 vs 1757

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5750

• 7.5x more pipelines: 720 vs 96
• 4.2x better floating-point performance: 1,008.0 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
• 2.6x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1168 vs 497
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 338 vs 142
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2124 vs 999
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2124 vs 999
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 3257
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 3257

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	497 1168
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	142 338
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2229 1039
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	999 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	999 2124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2333 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2333 1757
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3257 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3257 3347

Compare specifications (specs)