ATI Radeon IGP 320M vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M

Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon IGP 320M and ATI Radeon IGP 340M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

ATI Radeon IGP 320M

ATI Radeon IGP 340M

Differences

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon IGP 320M

Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4 vs 3

Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4 vs 3

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon IGP 340M

Around 14% higher core clock speed: 183 MHz vs 160 MHz
Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 180 MHz vs 160 MHz
Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 102 vs 101

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	183 MHz vs 160 MHz
Boost clock speed	180 MHz vs 160 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	102 vs 101

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI Radeon IGP 320M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon IGP 340M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

101

102

Name	ATI Radeon IGP 320M	ATI Radeon IGP 340M
PassMark - G3D Mark	4	3
PassMark - G2D Mark	101	102

Compare specifications (specs)

	ATI Radeon IGP 320M	ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Essentials
Architecture	Rage 7	Rage 6
Code name	RS320	RS200
Launch date	5 October 2002	5 October 2002
Place in performance rating	1363	1364
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	160 MHz	180 MHz
Core clock speed	160 MHz	183 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	180 nm	180 nm
Transistor count	30 million	30 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	AGP 4x	AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	7.0	7.0
OpenGL	1.4	1.4
Memory
Shared memory	yes	yes