NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT vs ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT and ATI Radeon IGP 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 9.4x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 160 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 180 nm
- 120.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 482 vs 4
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 October 2007 vs 5 October 2002 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 160 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 180 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 482 vs 4 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon IGP 320M
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 101 vs 61
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 101 vs 61 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
GPU 2: ATI Radeon IGP 320M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT | ATI Radeon IGP 320M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 482 | 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 61 | 101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT | ATI Radeon IGP 320M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rage 7 |
Code name | G92 | RS320 |
Launch date | 29 October 2007 | 5 October 2002 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Place in performance rating | 1357 | 1358 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 160 MHz |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 180 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 112 | |
Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 30 million |
Boost clock speed | 160 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 7.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | yes | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit |