ATI Radeon X1600 PRO vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M
Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon X1600 PRO and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1600 PRO
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 2 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 99 vs 47
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 October 2007 vs 1 June 2006 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 99 vs 47 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 41 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 79% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 780 MHz
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 41 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 vs 273 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Radeon X1600 PRO
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | ATI Radeon X1600 PRO | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 99 | 47 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 273 | 274 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | R500 | Curie |
Code name | RV530 | G72 |
Launch date | 1 October 2007 | 1 June 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 611 | 612 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Texture fill rate | 2 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 157 million | 112 million |
Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Pipelines | 4 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-III |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.48 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 700 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 780 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | 64 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |