AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM and ATI Radeon X1600 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 14.9x more texture fill rate: 29.76 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 5.9x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 394 vs 273
- 14.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1457 vs 99
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 1 October 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 29.76 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 vs 273 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1457 vs 99 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1600 PRO
- Around 59% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 65 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1600 PRO
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM | ATI Radeon X1600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 | 273 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1457 | 99 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40722 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3112 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3112 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM | ATI Radeon X1600 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | R500 |
| Code name | Cape Verde | RV530 |
| Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 1 October 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 599 | 604 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 930 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | |
| Texture fill rate | 29.76 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 41 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 157 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 12.48 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R9 255 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro 500M
AMDRadeon R9 255 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 555 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 255 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945A
AMDRadeon R9 255 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro P600
AMDRadeon R9 255 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 350
AMDRadeon R9 255 OEM vs
IntelUHD Graphics 750
