ATI Radeon X1650 GT vs NVIDIA GeForce 8200

Comparative analysis of ATI Radeon X1650 GT and NVIDIA GeForce 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8200

  • Around 25% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 400 MHz
Core clock speed 500 MHz vs 400 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: ATI Radeon X1650 GT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8200

Name ATI Radeon X1650 GT NVIDIA GeForce 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark 156
PassMark - G2D Mark 71
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 600
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 600

Compare specifications (specs)

ATI Radeon X1650 GT NVIDIA GeForce 8200

Essentials

Architecture R500 Tesla
Code name RV560 C78
Launch date 1 May 2007 17 April 2007
Place in performance rating not rated 1615
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 400 MHz 500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 80 nm 80 nm
Texture fill rate 3.2 GTexel / s
Transistor count 330 million 210 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16 PCI
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 9.0c 10.0
OpenGL 2.0 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 128 MB
Memory bandwidth 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 800 MHz
Memory type GDDR3

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare ATI Radeon X1650 GT with others

ATI Radeon X1650 GT ATI
Radeon X1650 GT
vs NVIDIA GeForce 8200 NVIDIA
GeForce 8200
ATI Radeon X1650 GT ATI
Radeon X1650 GT
vs NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a NVIDIA
GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
ATI Radeon X1650 GT ATI
Radeon X1650 GT
vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS NVIDIA
GeForce 8600M GS