Apple M1 Pro 14-core vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparative analysis of Apple M1 Pro 14-core and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 Pro 14-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
- 13.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20379 vs 19811
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20379 vs 19811
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7440 vs 3719
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7440 vs 3719
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6721 vs 3358
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6721 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2021 vs 13 August 2018 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20379 vs 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20379 vs 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7440 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7440 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6721 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6721 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1296 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 39596
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1296 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 vs 39596 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M1 Pro 14-core
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Apple M1 Pro 14-core | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39596 | 105171 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20379 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20379 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7440 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7440 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6721 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6721 | 3358 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15940 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Apple M1 Pro 14-core | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 26 Oct 2021 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 164 | 161 |
Architecture | Turing | |
Code name | TU104 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.644 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 14 | |
Render output units | 56 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 200 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 |