Intel Arc A570M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A570M and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A570M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 12800x more texture fill rate: 166.4 GTexel/s vs 13 billion / sec
- 32x more pipelines: 2048 vs 64
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 1 Aug 2023 vs 3 March 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 166.4 GTexel/s vs 13 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 64 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A570M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
Name | Intel Arc A570M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57214 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 504 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc A570M | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Tesla |
Code name | DG2-256 | G94 |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2023 | 3 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 371 | 372 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 64 |
Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 166.4 GTexel/s | 13 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 45 Watt |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 128 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 192 | |
Transistor count | 505 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
PCI-E 2.0 | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
PureVideo HD |