Intel Arc Pro A60 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A60 and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A60
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 116.3x more texture fill rate: 262.4 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8994 vs 8299
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63485 vs 55512
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 Jun 2023 vs 26 April 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 262.4 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8994 vs 8299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63485 vs 55512 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 4x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 2048
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 787 vs 708
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 2048 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 787 vs 708 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A60
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc Pro A60 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 708 | 787 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8994 | 8299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63485 | 55512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10141 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10141 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc Pro A60 | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | DG2-256 | Capsaicin |
Launch date | 6 Jun 2023 | 26 April 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 145 | 192 |
Design | reference | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Price now | $849 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 131.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 262.4 GTexel/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 350 Watt |
Compute units | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 277 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 3x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | DirectX® 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |