Intel GMA 3000 vs Matrox Parhelia APVe
Comparative analysis of Intel GMA 3000 and Matrox Parhelia APVe videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel GMA 3000
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 250 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 150 nm
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 250 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 150 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel GMA 3000
GPU 2: Matrox Parhelia APVe
| Name | Intel GMA 3000 | Matrox Parhelia APVe |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel GMA 3000 | Matrox Parhelia APVe | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 3.5 | Parhelia |
| Code name | Lakeport | Parhelia-512 |
| Launch date | 1 July 2006 | 14 June 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 649 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 150 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | |
| Texture fill rate | 1 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 80 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 9.0c | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 1.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR | |
