Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 vs ATI Rage 128 PRO

Comparative analysis of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 and ATI Rage 128 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 250 nm
Launch date 1 November 2011 vs 1 August 1999
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 250 nm

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 ATI Rage 128 PRO

Essentials

Architecture PowerVR SGX5 Rage 4
Code name Cedar Trail Rage 4
Launch date 1 November 2011 1 August 1999
Place in performance rating not rated not rated
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 250 nm
Pipelines 4
Core clock speed 118 MHz
Texture fill rate 236.0 MTexel / s
Transistor count 8 million

Memory

Shared memory 1
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB
Memory bandwidth 1.144 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 143 MHz
Memory type SDR

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 6.0
OpenGL 1.2