Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
Comparative analysis of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 and NVIDIA Quadro 2000D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
- 48x more pipelines: 192 vs 4
| Pipelines | 192 vs 4 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
| Name | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000D |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 976 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 328 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.122 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 320.57 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.67 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1453 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3447 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1453 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3447 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 | NVIDIA Quadro 2000D | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | PowerVR SGX5 | Fermi |
| Code name | Cedar Trail | GF106 |
| Launch date | 1 November 2011 | 5 October 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 1127 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Price now | $209 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.27 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 640 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 4 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 with others
IntelGraphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 2000D
IntelGraphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5570
IntelGraphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
