Intel HD Graphics 2500 vs AMD Radeon HD 7570
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 2500 and AMD Radeon HD 7570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
| Launch date | 1 April 2012 vs 5 January 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570
- 13.6x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 1.15 GTexel / s
- 80x more pipelines: 480 vs 6
- 45.2x better floating-point performance: 624 gflops vs 13.8 gflops
- 6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1550 vs 249
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 1.15 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 6 |
| Floating-point performance | 624 gflops vs 13.8 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1550 vs 249 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 2500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 2500 | AMD Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 249 | 1550 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 614 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 256 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.874 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 259.769 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.487 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.033 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 57.396 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1389 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2724 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1389 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2724 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 2500 | AMD Radeon HD 7570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Ivy Bridge GT1 | Turks |
| Launch date | 1 April 2012 | 5 January 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1710 | 1254 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 13.8 gflops | 624 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 6 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 1.15 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 716 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | |