Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and AMD Radeon HD 7560D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 524 vs 459
- Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 165
- Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2143 vs 1423
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 817 vs 593
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 1076
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 1990
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 817 vs 593
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 1076
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 1990
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 September 2013 vs 26 September 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 vs 459 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 vs 165 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 vs 1423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 vs 593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 vs 1076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 vs 1990 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 vs 593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 vs 1076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 vs 1990 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7560D
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 760 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 12.8x more pipelines: 256 vs 20
| Core clock speed | 760 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 256 vs 20 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7560D
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | AMD Radeon HD 7560D |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 | 459 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 | 165 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 | 1423 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 | 593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 | 1076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 | 1990 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 | 593 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 | 1076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 | 1990 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4400 | AMD Radeon HD 7560D | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Terascale 3 |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | Trinity |
| Launch date | 3 September 2013 | 26 September 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1421 | 1423 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 760 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 46 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 256 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.6 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 392 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
