Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs AMD Radeon HD 8350G
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and AMD Radeon HD 8350G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 720 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 32 nm
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 524 vs 258
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 124
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1381 vs 1104
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 1685
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1381 vs 1104
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 1685
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 September 2013 vs 12 March 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 720 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 vs 258 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 vs 124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 vs 1104 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 vs 1685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 vs 1104 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 vs 1685 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8350G
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 514 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 6.4x more pipelines: 128 vs 20
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4669 vs 2143
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 514 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 128 vs 20 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4669 vs 2143 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8350G
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | AMD Radeon HD 8350G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 524 | 258 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 | 124 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 | 4669 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 | 1104 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 | 1685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 | 1104 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 | 1685 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4400 | AMD Radeon HD 8350G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Terascale 3 |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | Richland |
| Launch date | 3 September 2013 | 12 March 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1421 | 1422 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 514 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 46 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.6 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 392 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
