Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 753 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 277 vs 111
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 vs 7.699
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 vs 0.727
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 2827
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 2827
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 September 2013 vs 27 October 2011 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 753 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 vs 111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 vs 7.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 vs 0.727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 vs 2827 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 vs 2827 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
- 7.2x more pipelines: 144 vs 20
- 8.5x better floating-point performance: 388.8 gflops vs 46 gflops
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 654 vs 522
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2860 vs 2143
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 252.895 vs 154.696
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.581 vs 9.084
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 21.909 vs 8.335
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1134 vs 817
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 vs 1381
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1134 vs 817
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 vs 1381
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 144 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 388.8 gflops vs 46 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 654 vs 522 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2860 vs 2143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 252.895 vs 154.696 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.581 vs 9.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.909 vs 8.335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1134 vs 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2265 vs 1381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1134 vs 817 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2265 vs 1381 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 522 | 654 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 | 111 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2143 | 2860 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.844 | 7.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 154.696 | 252.895 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.958 | 0.727 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.084 | 12.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.335 | 21.909 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 817 | 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1381 | 2265 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3044 | 2827 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 817 | 1134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1381 | 2265 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3044 | 2827 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 152 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 4400 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Fermi |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | GF106 |
Launch date | 3 September 2013 | 27 October 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1417 | 1419 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 753 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 46 gflops | 388.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 20 | 144 |
Texture fill rate | 4.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | Up to 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory type | DDR3\DDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |