Intel HD Graphics 4400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4400 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 753 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 278 vs 112
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.844 vs 7.438
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 vs 0.717
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3044 vs 2827
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3044 vs 2827

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M

• 7.2x more pipelines: 144 vs 20
• 8.5x better floating-point performance: 388.8 gflops vs 46 gflops
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 661 vs 521
• Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2833 vs 2178
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 252.895 vs 154.696
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.581 vs 9.084
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 21.909 vs 8.335
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1134 vs 817
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2265 vs 1381
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1134 vs 817
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2265 vs 1381

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	521 661
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	278 112
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2178 2833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.844 7.438
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	154.696 252.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.958 0.717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.084 12.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.335 21.909
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	817 1134
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1381 2265
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3044 2827
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	817 1134
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1381 2265
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3044 2827

Compare specifications (specs)