Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs ATI Radeon HD 5450
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and ATI Radeon HD 5450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 92% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 650 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 vs 136
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 140
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 vs 2572
- 7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 0.16
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.361 vs 10.124
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 988 vs 344
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 666
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 1457
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 988 vs 344
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 666
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 1457
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 June 2013 vs 4 February 2010 |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 vs 136 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 vs 140 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 vs 2572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 vs 0.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 vs 10.124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 vs 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 vs 1457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 vs 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 vs 1457 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5450
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 5.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 80 vs 20
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 104 gflops vs 50 gflops
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 45 Watt
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5.2 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 80 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 104 gflops vs 50 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | ATI Radeon HD 5450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 136 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 140 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 2572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 0.16 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 10.124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 1457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 1457 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 4600 | ATI Radeon HD 5450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Haswell GT2 | Cedar |
Launch date | 3 June 2013 | 4 February 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1359 | 1606 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 650 MHz |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 50 gflops | 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 20 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 392 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR2 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity |