Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs Intel HD Graphics 2500
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and Intel HD Graphics 2500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 1.15 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 20 vs 6
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 50 gflops vs 13.8 gflops
- 12.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 vs 249
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2013 vs 1 April 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s vs 1.15 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 20 vs 6 |
| Floating-point performance | 50 gflops vs 13.8 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 vs 249 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 2500
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 400 MHz
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 2500
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics 2500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Generation 7.0 |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | Ivy Bridge GT1 |
| Launch date | 3 June 2013 | 1 April 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1359 | 1710 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 50 gflops | 13.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 6 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 1.15 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.1 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.0 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||


