Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 96 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 vs 477
- 7.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 44
- 19x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 vs 0.465
- 13.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 127
- 13.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 127
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 June 2013 vs 21 February 2008 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 96 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 vs 477 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 vs 44 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 vs 0.465 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 vs 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 vs 127 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 4.2x more texture fill rate: 20.8 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 64 vs 20
- 4.2x better floating-point performance: 208 gflops vs 50 gflops
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3161 vs 2808
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3161 vs 2808
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 20.8 billion / sec vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 64 vs 20 |
| Floating-point performance | 208 gflops vs 50 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3161 vs 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3161 vs 2808 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 477 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 44 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 0.465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 3161 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 3161 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Tesla |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | G94 |
| Launch date | 3 June 2013 | 21 February 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1359 | 1587 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Price now | $39.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1625 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 50 gflops | 208 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | 64 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 20.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 96 Watt |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 4600 with others
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GTX
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5650
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 305M
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 530 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
IntelHD Graphics 4600 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M435DX
