Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA NVS 315 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 4.184 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 vs 320
• Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 180
• 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 vs 882
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 vs 3.025
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 vs 79.479
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 vs 0.217
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.385 vs 4.705
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.361 vs 6.573
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 988 vs 465
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 vs 942
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 1382
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 988 vs 465
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 vs 942
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 1382

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 315

• Around 31% higher core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 2.4x more pipelines: 48 vs 20
• 2x better floating-point performance: 100.4 gflops vs 50 gflops
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 45 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 315

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	630 320
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	314 180
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3210 882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.844 3.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	171.17 79.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.115 0.217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.385 4.705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.361 6.573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 465
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 942
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	988 465
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1702 942
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2808 1382

Compare specifications (specs)