Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus NVIDIA NVS 315

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and NVIDIA NVS 315 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 4600

versus

NVIDIA NVS 315

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
Environ 20% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 5 GTexel / s versus 4.184 GTexel / s
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 40 nm
Environ 97% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 versus 320
Environ 74% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 versus 180
3.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3210 versus 882
2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.844 versus 3.025
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 versus 79.479
5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.115 versus 0.217
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.385 versus 4.705
Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.361 versus 6.573
2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 988 versus 465
Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1702 versus 942
2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 versus 1382
2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 988 versus 465
Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1702 versus 942
2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 versus 1382

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	3 June 2013 versus 10 March 2013
Taux de remplissage de la texture	5 GTexel / s versus 4.184 GTexel / s
Processus de fabrication	22 nm versus 40 nm
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	630 versus 320
PassMark - G2D Mark	314 versus 180
Geekbench - OpenCL	3210 versus 882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.844 versus 3.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	171.17 versus 79.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.115 versus 0.217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	10.385 versus 4.705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	12.361 versus 6.573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	988 versus 465
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1702 versus 942
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2808 versus 1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	988 versus 465
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1702 versus 942
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2808 versus 1382

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA NVS 315

Environ 31% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 523 MHz versus 400 MHz
2.4x plus de pipelines: 48 versus 20
2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 100.4 gflops versus 50 gflops
2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 45 Watt

Vitesse du noyau	523 MHz versus 400 MHz
Pipelines	48 versus 20
Performance á point flottant	100.4 gflops versus 50 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	19 Watt versus 45 Watt

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 315

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

630

320

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

314

180

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3210

882

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.844

3.025

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

171.17

79.479

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.115

0.217

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.385

4.705

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.361

6.573

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

988

465

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1702

942

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2808

1382

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

988

465

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1702

942

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2808

1382

Nom	Intel HD Graphics 4600	NVIDIA NVS 315
PassMark - G3D Mark	630	320
PassMark - G2D Mark	314	180
Geekbench - OpenCL	3210	882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.844	3.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	171.17	79.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.115	0.217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	10.385	4.705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	12.361	6.573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	988	465
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1702	942
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2808	1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	988	465
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1702	942
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2808	1382
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	194

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel HD Graphics 4600	NVIDIA NVS 315
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 7.5	Fermi 2.0
Nom de code	Haswell GT2	GF119
Date de sortie	3 June 2013	10 March 2013
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1359	1577
Genre	Laptop	Workstation
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$159
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1250 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	400 MHz	523 MHz
Performance á point flottant	50 gflops	100.4 gflops
Processus de fabrication	22 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	20	48
Taux de remplissage de la texture	5 GTexel / s	4.184 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	19 Watt
Compte de transistor	392 million	292 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	1x DMS-59
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Longeur		145 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires		None
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	64 Bit
Mémoire partagé	1
RAM maximale		1 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire		14 GB / s
Vitesse de mémoire		1750 MHz
Genre de mémoire		DDR3
Technologies
Quick Sync