Intel HD Graphics 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel HD Graphics 510

NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 6 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
6.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 96 Watt
64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 621 vs 477
3.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 162 vs 44
30.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.381 vs 0.465
10.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1333 vs 127
10.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1333 vs 127

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 September 2015 vs 21 February 2008
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 96 Watt
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	621 vs 477
PassMark - G2D Mark	162 vs 44
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.381 vs 0.465
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1333 vs 127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1333 vs 127

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

5.4x more core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 20.8 billion / sec vs 11.4 GTexel / s
5.3x more pipelines: 64 vs 12
Around 14% better floating-point performance: 208 gflops vs 182.4 gflops
Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3161 vs 1786
Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3161 vs 1786

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1625 MHz vs 300 MHz
Texture fill rate	20.8 billion / sec vs 11.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	64 vs 12
Floating-point performance	208 gflops vs 182.4 gflops
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3161 vs 1786
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3161 vs 1786

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

621

477

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

162

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14.381

0.465

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1333

127

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1786

3161

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1333

127

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1786

3161

Name	Intel HD Graphics 510	NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark	621	477
PassMark - G2D Mark	162	44
Geekbench - OpenCL	2381
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.381	0.465
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	215.873
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.081
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	11.675
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	15.094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	902
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1333	127
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1786	3161
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	902
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1333	127
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1786	3161
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 510	NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.0	Tesla
Code name	Skylake GT1	G94
Launch date	1 September 2015	21 February 2008
Place in performance rating	1509	1587
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$179
Price now		$39.99
Value for money (0-100)		23.72
Technical info
Boost clock speed	950 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1625 MHz
Floating-point performance	182.4 gflops	208 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	12	64
Texture fill rate	11.4 GTexel / s	20.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	96 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	505 million
CUDA cores		64
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI		S / PDIF
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus support		16x PCI-E 2.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		9" (22.9 cm)
SLI options		2-way
Supplementary power connectors		6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	2.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory type	LPDDR3 / DDR4	GDDR3
Shared memory	1
Memory bandwidth		57.6 GB / s
Memory clock speed		900 MHz
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Vision
CUDA
SLI