Intel HD Graphics 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 32 Watt
• 64x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 512 MB
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.381 vs 6.577
• Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.081 vs 0.559
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.094 vs 12.554
• 31.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 902 vs 28.9
• 27.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1333 vs 48.1
• 17.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1786 vs 99.8

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

• 2.5x more core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 23.84 GTexel / s vs 11.4 GTexel / s
• 32x more pipelines: 384 vs 12
• 3.1x better floating-point performance: 572.2 gflops vs 182.4 gflops
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 226.218 vs 215.873
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.947 vs 11.675
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1706 vs 902
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2983 vs 1333
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5586 vs 1786

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.381 6.577
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.873 226.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.081 0.559
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.675 11.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.094 12.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 1706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1333 2983
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1786 5586
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 28.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1333 48.1
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1786 99.8

Compare specifications (specs)