Intel HD Graphics 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce 800M

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 510 and NVIDIA GeForce 800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 510

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 93% higher texture fill rate: 11.4 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
• Around 29% better floating-point performance: 182.4 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 622 vs 457
• Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2381 vs 1303
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.381 vs 4.91
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.873 vs 109.13
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.675 vs 7.249
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 902 vs 703
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1333 vs 1123
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1786 vs 1601
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 902 vs 703
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1333 vs 1123
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1786 vs 1601

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M

• 2.5x more core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 4x more pipelines: 48 vs 12
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 203 vs 162
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.218 vs 15.094

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 510
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 800M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	622 457
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	162 203
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2381 1303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.381 4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.873 109.13
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.675 7.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.094 15.218
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 703
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1333 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1786 1601
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	902 703
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1333 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1786 1601

Compare specifications (specs)