Intel HD Graphics 5600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 980 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 16 August 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 56x more pipelines: 1344 vs 24
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4422 vs 2264
- 6.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15315 vs 2427
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 1598
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 1598
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4422 vs 2264 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 463 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15315 vs 2427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 1598 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 1598 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics 5600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2264 | 4422 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 463 | 465 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2427 | 15315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1598 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1598 | 3684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1616 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics 5600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GK104 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 16 August 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 743 | 745 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Price now | $321.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 915 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 1344 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |