Intel HD Graphics 5600 vs AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5600 and AMD Radeon HD 8790M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 850 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1869 vs 1306
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3330 vs 2014
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3330 vs 2014
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1869 vs 1306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 vs 2014 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 vs 2014 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8790M
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 401
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4920 vs 2427
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2656 vs 1598
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2656 vs 1598
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 vs 401 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4920 vs 2427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2656 vs 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2656 vs 1598 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 5600 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1869 | 1306 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 401 | 751 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2427 | 4920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | 2014 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | 2014 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1598 | 2656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1598 | 2656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.759 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.631 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.576 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.839 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 80.418 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2181 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2181 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1607 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 5600 | AMD Radeon HD 8790M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT2 | Mars |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 836 | 837 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,040 million |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 5600 with others
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4250
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000M
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8790M
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570X
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
