Intel HD Graphics 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5600 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 401 vs 301
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 1 June 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 401 vs 301 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
- 2x more core clock speed: 601 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 40x more pipelines: 960 vs 24
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 1869
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5986 vs 2427
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 vs 3330
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 vs 3330
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 vs 1598
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 vs 1598
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 601 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 vs 1869 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5986 vs 2427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4470 vs 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4470 vs 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4957 vs 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4957 vs 1598 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 5600 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1869 | 1978 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 401 | 301 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2427 | 5986 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | 4470 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | 4470 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1598 | 4957 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1598 | 4957 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.054 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.601 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.46 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.103 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.553 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3855 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3855 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 5600 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 836 | 838 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 601 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 960 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 3,540 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 48.08 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||

