Intel HD Graphics 5600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 967 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 463 vs 276
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 12 March 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 967 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 463 vs 276 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 56x more pipelines: 1344 vs 24
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3450 vs 2264
- 5.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12598 vs 2366
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3330
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3330
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1598
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1598
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3450 vs 2264 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12598 vs 2366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 1598 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 5600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2264 | 3450 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 463 | 276 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2366 | 12598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1598 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1598 | 3718 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.753 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 5600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 12 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 741 | 743 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 967 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 941 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1344 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB / s | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 5600 with others
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
ATIFireGL V3200
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8870M
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830A
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560D
IntelHD Graphics 5600 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 710
