Intel HD Graphics 6000 vs NVIDIA GRID K1

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 6000 and NVIDIA GRID K1 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Intel HD Graphics 6000

NVIDIA GRID K1

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 6000

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
8.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 130 Watt
Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 865 vs 651
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 276 vs 259
Around 80% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3554 vs 1976
3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 vs 354
3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 vs 354
10.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3259 vs 319
10.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3259 vs 319

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 September 2014 vs 18 March 2013
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 130 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	865 vs 651
PassMark - G2D Mark	276 vs 259
Geekbench - OpenCL	3554 vs 1976
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1363 vs 354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1363 vs 354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3259 vs 319
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3259 vs 319

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K1

2.8x more core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 300 MHz
16x more pipelines: 4x 192 vs 48
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1237 vs 1225
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1237 vs 1225

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	850 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	4x 192 vs 48
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1237 vs 1225
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1237 vs 1225

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K1

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

865

651

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

276

259

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3554

1976

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1225

1237

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1225

1237

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1363

354

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1363

354

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3259

319

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3259

319

Name	Intel HD Graphics 6000	NVIDIA GRID K1
PassMark - G3D Mark	865	651
PassMark - G2D Mark	276	259
Geekbench - OpenCL	3554	1976
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1225	1237
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1225	1237
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1363	354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1363	354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3259	319
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3259	319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		4.591
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		169.864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		8.734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		10.43

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel HD Graphics 6000	NVIDIA GRID K1
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 8.0	Kepler
Code name	Broadwell GT3	GK107
Launch date	5 September 2014	18 March 2013
Place in performance rating	1119	1520
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$4,140
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	850 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	48	4x 192
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	130 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	1,270 million
Floating-point performance		4x 326.4 gflops
Texture fill rate		4x 13.6 GTexel / s billion / sec
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Memory bus width	64 / 128 Bit	4x 128 Bit
Shared memory	1
Maximum RAM amount		4x 4 GB
Memory bandwidth		4x 28.51 GB / s
Memory clock speed		1782 MHz
Memory type		DDR3
Technologies
Quick Sync