Intel HD Graphics P3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P3000 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P3000
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 672 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 672 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 286 vs 280
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 77 vs 65
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2380 vs 1300
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2380 vs 1300
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 286 vs 280 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 77 vs 65 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2380 vs 1300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2380 vs 1300 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics P3000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 280 | 286 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 65 | 77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1300 | 2380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1300 | 2380 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1313 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 83.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.92 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.992 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1731 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 536 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1731 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics P3000 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 6.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Sandy Bridge GT2 | GF108 |
Launch date | 1 February 2011 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1556 | 1558 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.54 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 672 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Transistor count | 995 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 129.02 gflops | |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Texture fill rate | 5.9 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 12 API |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |