Intel HD Graphics P3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics P3000 and NVIDIA GeForce 410M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P3000
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 280 vs 267
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 280 vs 267 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 410M
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 130 vs 65
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1570 vs 1300
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1570 vs 1300
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 130 vs 65 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1570 vs 1300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1570 vs 1300 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics P3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 410M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel HD Graphics P3000 | NVIDIA GeForce 410M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 280 | 267 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 65 | 130 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1300 | 1570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1300 | 1570 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1003 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.846 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 86.519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.048 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 494 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1163 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 494 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1163 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel HD Graphics P3000 | NVIDIA GeForce 410M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 6.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Sandy Bridge GT2 | GF119 |
Launch date | 1 February 2011 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1556 | 1557 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Transistor count | 995 million | 292 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 110.4 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Texture fill rate | 4.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 1 |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Power management | 8.0 |